|
National Park Service History Electronic Library & Archive
The NPS History Electronic
Library & Archive is a portal to electronic publications covering the history of
the National Park Service (NPS) and the cultural and natural history of the national
parks, monuments, and historic sites of the (U.S.) National Park System. Also included
are documents for national monuments managed by other federal agencies, along with a
collection of U.S. Forest Service publications.
The information contained in this Website is historical in scope and is
not meant as an aid for travel planning; please refer to the official
NATIONAL
PARK SERVICE Website for current/additional information. While we
are an independent endeavor and not affiliated with the National Park
Service, we gratefully acknowledge the contributions by park employees
and advocates, which has enabled us to create this free digital
repository.
New eLibrary Additions
Featured Publications
 cover only Searching for AuthenticityRustic Architecture in America 1877-1940Edward R. Ford(2025)
|
|
Sierra National Park and the Expansion Area (Susan Thew, June 1926)
The Lore and the Lure of Sequoia (Herbert Earl Wilson, 1928)
Long-Term Management Strategies for USS Arizona, A Submerged Cultural Resource in Pearl Harbor Submerged Resources Center Professional Report No. 27 (Larry E. Murphy and Matthew A. Russell, eds., 2008)
Historical Architectural Survey of Delaware Water Gap National Recreational Area: Volume I (1974)
Historical Architectural Survey of Delaware Water Gap National Recreational Area: Volume II (1974)
The Archeology of Freedom and Slavery: Excavations at the President's House Site in Philadelphia (Douglas Mooney, Ingred Wuebber, Cheryl Janifer LaRoche, Jed Levin, Patrice L. Jeppson, Joe Roberts and Karen Lind Brauer, November 2009, rev. September 2023)
Papago Saguaro National Monument (extract from Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council Lookout, Winter 2025)
The Prehistoric Cliff Dwellings, Mesa Verde National Park, Southwestern Colorado (Denver & Rio Grande Railroad, 1915)
The Role of the General Federation of Women's Clubs in the Restoration and Refurnishing of Independence Hall 1953-1963 (Ronald F. Lee and M.O. Anderson, 1965)
Wondrous Rides Through Nature's Wonders (Richard E. Weingroff and Sherry Hayman, extract from Public Roads, Vol. 80 No. 3, November/December 2016)
The Road Is a Park, and the Park Is a Road (Norah Davis, extract from Public Roads, Vol. 80 No. 3, November/December 2016)
Historic Structures Report: Fort Pickens and Battery Pensacola, Gulf Islands National Seashore (Liz Sargent HLA, Wise, Janney Elstner Associates, Inc., Historical Research Associates, Inc., WFT Architects and Maptech, Inc., 2025)
Historic Structure Report: Kingsley Plantation Barn, Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve (Liz Sargent HLA and Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc., 2025)
Incremental Historic Structure Report Part I: Pisgah Inn, Blue Ridge Parkway (Arin Streeter, December 2025)
Historic Structure Report: Maurice Bathhouse, Hot Springs National Park, Arkansas (Chamberlain Architects and The Collaborative, November 2004)
Historic Resource Study: Richmond National Battlefield Park (Laura Kline, Stephen Olausen, Ashley Spivey, Lisa Bergstrom, Gretchen Pineo, Jillian Millar and Kathryn Whitehall, October 2024)
Historic Resource Study, Lake Clark National Park and Preserve, Alaska (Harlan D. Unrau, 1994)
A Place Called Jackson Hole: The Historic Resource Study of Grand Teton National Park (John Daugherty, 1999)
Cultural Landscape Treatment Plan and Environmental Assessment: Perry's Victory and International Peace Memorial Draft (Commonwealth Heritage Group and Period Architecture, February 2018)
The Historic Period at Bandelier National Monument Intermountain Cultural Resources Management Professional Paper No. 63 (Monica L. Smith, 2002)
An Analysis of Variability and Condition of Cavate Structures in Bandelier National Monument Intermountain Cultural Resources Center Professional Paper No. 53 (H. Wolcott Toll, 1995)
The Bandelier Archeological Survey, Volume I Intermountain Cultural Resources Management Professional Paper No. 57 (Robert P. Powers and Janet D. Orcutt, eds., 1999)
The Bandelier Archeological Survey, Volume II Intermountain Cultural Resources Management Professional Paper No. 57 (Robert P. Powers and Janet D. Orcutt, eds., 1999)
Historic Grounds Report and Management Plan, Frederick Law Olmsted (Lucinda Adele Whitehill, 1982)
Channel Islands National Park and Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary Submerged Cultural Resources Assessment Intermountain Cultural Resource Centers Professional Papers No. 56/Submerged Cultural Resources Report No. 14 (Don P. Morris and James Lima, 1996)
From Folsom to Fogelson: The Cultural Resources Inventory Survey of Pecos National Historical Park, Volume 1 Intermountain Cultural Resource Management Professional Paper No. 66 (Genevieve N. Head and Janet D. Orcutt, eds., 2002)
From Folsom to Fogelson: The Cultural Resources Inventory Survey of Pecos National Historical Park, Volume 2 Intermountain Cultural Resource Management Professional Paper No. 66 (Genevieve N. Head and Janet D. Orcutt, eds., 2002)
Cultural Resources Data Recovery Program at Selected Archaeological Sites Along the PNM-DOE Pipeline in the Santa Fe National Forest and the Valles Caldera National Preserve, New Mexico LOPEZGARCIAI GROUP Miscellaneous Reports, Report of Investigations No. 6 (Allan Schilz, John C. Acklen, Hollis P. Lawrence, Kristy Harbour, Timothy G. Baugh, Scott A. Sundermeyer, Sherry N. DeFreece, Charles D. Neel and Grant Smith, April 2005)
The Underworld of Oregon Caves (Roger J. Contor, 1963)
The Underworld of Oregon Caves (Roger J. Contor, 1963, reprint ed.)
An Account of the First Attempt at Exploration of the "Oregon Caves" (Wm. W. Fidler, extract from The Quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. XXIII, March-December 1922)
History of the Discovery of the Marble Halls of Oregon (E.J. Davidson, extract from The Quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. XXIII, March-December 1922)
Timpanogos Cave (Shaun R. Nelson, ed., extract from History of the Uinta National Forest: A Century of Stewardship, 1997)
American Alps Legacy Proposal: Completing the Conservation Vision for the North Cascades National Park (American Alps Legacy Project, September 2011)
Do We Know It When We See It? Defining Significance and Integrity in the National Women's History Landmark Project, 1989-1993 (Sarah Pawlicki, extract from Park Stewardship Forum, Vol. 42 Issue 1, 2026)
A Special History of Thomas Edison National Historical Park: Challenges and Opportunities (Melissa Benbow Flowers, extract from Park Stewardship Forum, Vol. 42 Issue 1, 2026)
Completion Report: Pueblo Pintado Ruin, Chaco Canyon National Monument (November 1971)
Disrupted Pathways: Indigenous Knowledge and the Shifting Politics of Federal Resource Governance (Shelly Annette Biesel, extract from Park Stewardship Forum, Vol. 42 Issue 1, 2026)
Report on Text Excavations at Four Sites in the Illinois and Michigan Canal National Heritage Corridor, La Salle and Grundy Counties, Illinois Northwestern Archaeological Center Contributions No. 6 (Robert J. Jeske and John P. Hart, November 28, 1988)
Economic performance of communities near national monuments (Megan Lawson, January 20, 2026; ©Headwaters Economics)
Alaska Park Science The Changing Human Dimensions of Alaska Parks (Vol. 23 No. 1, December 2025)
Geology of the Bighorn Canyon-Hardin area, Montana and Wyoming USGS Bulletin 1026 (Paul W. Richards, 1955)
Characterizing Shifts in Fish Community Diversity of Isle Royale National Park's Inland Lakes NPS Science Report NPS/SR-2026/375 (David J. Gallagher, Thomas R. Hrabik, Jay D. Glase, Seth A. Moore and Mark C. Romanski, January 2026)
Scientific Evaluation of the Giant Sequoia National Monument Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement (Dominick A. DellaSala, November 19, 2012)
Geographically Widespread Drift Log Destruction of Intertidal Communities on Rocky Shores of Western Canada (E. Pérez Andresen, M.G. Marchant and T.E. Reimchen, extract from Marine Ecology, Vol. 46 Issue 5, September 2025)
Assessment of Treated Wastewater Infiltration in Bright Angel Wash and the Potential for Contaminants of Emerging Concern Influencing Spring Water Quality Along the South Rim of the Grand Canyon in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2025-5095 (Nicholas V. Paretti, Kimberly R. Beisner and Sarah J.R. Shepard, 2025)
Multi-ignition fire complexes drive extreme fire years and impacts (Rebecca C. Scholten, Tirtha Banerjee, Yang Chen, Andrea Delgado1, Ajinkya Desai, Ziming Ke, Tianjia Liu, Douglas C. Morton, David A. Peterson, Qi Tang, Sander Veraverbeke, Jishi Zhang and James T. Randerson, extract from Science Advances, Vol. 12 Issue 1, January 2026)
Grassland Inventory and Assessment: Richmond National Battlefield Park NPS Science Report NPS/SR-2026/374 (J. Christopher Ludwig, Philip A. Barlow and Theo Witsell, January 2026)
Groundwater Tracing Used to Delineate Recharge Areas and Map Karst Groundwater Pathways for Subterranean Streams at Oregon Caves National Monument and Preserve U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2025-5084 (Benjamin V. Miller, 2025)
The Current: Newsletter of the Great Lakes Inventory and Monitoring Network (Fall 2025/Winter 2026)
Diets, dominance hierarchies, and kleptoparasitism drive asymmetrical interactions between wolves and cougars (Wesley Binder, Joel S. Ruprecht, Jack Rabe, Matthew C. Metz, Rebecca Hutchinson, Daniel R. Stahler, and Taal Levi, extract from PNAS, Vol. 123 No. 6, January 26, 2026)
From models to management: Implementing the climate-change refugia conservation cycle in national parks of the northeastern United States (Christopher P. Nadeau, Jennifer R. Smetzer, Sara Wisner, Kyle A. Lima, A. Randall Hughes, Abraham J. Miller-Rushing, Jesse S. Wheeler, Toni Lyn Morelli, Tina G. Mozelewski, extract from Conservation Science and Practice, Vol. 8 No. 1, January 2026)
Master Plan, Proposed Saugus Iron Works National Historic Site, Massachusetts (1968)
Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore: A Proposal (1966)
Devil Postpile National Monument, California (extract from Sierra Club Bulletin, Vol. VIII No. 3, January 1912)
Proposed Buffalo National River, Arkansas (1968)
Master Plan for Proposed Amistad National Recreation Area, Texas (June 1968)
A Master Plan for Independence National Historical Park (July 1970)
The Lost Art of the Master Plan: Managing Visitor Use in Yellowstone and Beyond (Sharon Buccino, extract from Wyoming Law Review, Vol. 22 No. 2, 2022; ©Wyoming Law Review)
Visitor Use Management Plan and Environmental Assessment, Cumberland Island National Seashore (December 2025)
Comprehensive River Management Plan: St. Croix National Scenic Riverway (2026)
Tidal Basin Development Concept Plan Environmental Assessment (January 2026)
Extracts from Reports of the Superintendents of Yellowstone, Glacier, Sequoia and General Grant, Crater Lake, Mount Rainier and Yosemite National Parks (1911) (extract from Sierra Club Bulletin, Vol. VIII No. 3, January 1912)
Extracts from Report of the Secretary of the Interior (1911): Bureau of National Parks (extract from Sierra Club Bulletin, Vol. VIII No. 3, January 1912)
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement: Bakersfield Field Office Oil and Gas Leasing and Development (December 10, 2025)
Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan: Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (BLM, January 2025)
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land ManagementApplicability of the Congressional Review Act to the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan (GAO Decision, B-337705, January 15, 2026)
Dawn of the Cretaceous Fossil Beds National Monument, UT (2025)
A Guide to the National Parks of America (Edward Frank Allen, comp. and ed., 1915)
A Guide to the National Parks of America (Edward Frank Allen, comp. and ed., May 1915, rev. June 1918)
A National Park Service (extract from The Outlook, Vol. 100 Issue 5, February 3, 1912)
Are National Parks Worth While? (J. Horace McFarland, extract from Siera Club Bulletin, Vol. VIII No. 3, January 1912)
How To Get to the National Parks (John P. Dods, extract from Motor Age, Vol. XXV No. 15, April 9, 1914)
Our National Parks (L.F. Schmeckebier, extract from The National Geographic Magazine, Vol. XXIII No. 6, June 1912)
Our National Parks and Reservations (William Eleroy Curtis, extract from The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. XXXV No. 2, March 1910)
Scenery as a National Asset (Allen Chamberlain, extract from The Outlook, Vol. 95 Issue 4, May 28, 1910)
The National Parks From the Scientific and Educational Side (Laurence F. Schmeckebier, extract from The Popular Science Monthly, Vol. 80 No. 6, June 1912)
The Parks and Recreation Facilities in the United States (John Nolen, extract from The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. XXXV No. 2, March 1910)
The Unknown Wonders of Our National Parks (extract from The World's Work, Vol. 24 Issue 1, May 1912)
Uncle SamHis Parks: Another Argument for "See America First" (C.G. Sinsabaugh, extract from Motor Age, Vol. XXV No. 15, April 9, 1914)
Brochures: Cape Cod (1981) •
Canyonlands (1981) •
Canyonlands (1983) •
Carlsbad Caverns (1984) •
Fort Bowie (1981) •
Fort Laramie (1968) •
Fort McHenry (1968) •
Fort Raleigh (1969) •
Fort Scott (1980) •
Fredericksburg & Spotsylvania (1971) •
George Rogers Clark (1974) •
Guilford Courthouse (1968) •
Guilford Courthouse (1974) •
Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt (1971) •
Sitka (1967) •
White Sands (1982)
Site Bulletins (Independence NHP):
Map: (In)Visible Architects of Freedom (2025) •
The President's House 1790-1800 (2005) •
The President's House 1790-1800 (2009) •
The President's House: Freedom nd Slavery in the Making of a New Nation (2010) •
Quest for Freedom: the Underground Railroad in Philadelphia Walking Tour (Date Unknown)
NPS Reflections
|

The historic Old Courthouse sits gracefully among the
modern buildings of downtown St. Louis, while the Gateway Arch dominates
the skyline behind it. (NPS photo)
Meet Them in St. Louis!
By Loretta Neumann
By day, it's majestic. Sun glints off cold steel, dominating the skyline
for miles around.
By night, it's romantic. Moonlight shimmers on satin, reflecting the
ripples from the river below.
It's the Gateway Arch, part of the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial
(JNEM) in St. Louis. The tallest memorial in the country, the Arch is
630 feet high and tops the Washington Monument by 75 feet and the Statue
of Liberty by 325.
Designed by the noted architect Eero Saarinen, it symbolizes the gateway
through which the trappers, explorers, adventurers and settlers made
their way westfrom the time of Thomas Jefferson's Louisiana
Purchase in 1803 until 1890 when the Census Bureau announced that a
frontier line no longer existed in the United States.
Located on a 91-acre park along the Mississippi River near downtown St.
Louis, JNEM also contains the Old Courthouse, where Dred Scott sued for
freedom from slavery and where many laws affecting western expansion
were debated. Acquired by NPS in 1940, the building serves as
headquarters for JNEM.
Next to the Arch is the Old Cathedral, the only structure standing on
its original foundations in old St. Louis. It is located on the site of
the first church built in St. Louis, and still has Mass served in it.

Visitors peer at the spectacular views of St. Louis
from the observation room in the top of the Arch. In uniform in the
center is Roy Scown, chief of maintenance. (NPS photo)
More Than Buildings
But JNEM is more than just buildings.
"It's an urban park dream," declares Ivan Parker, park superintendent
and NPS state director for Missouri.
He says that they are developing park programs "responsive to a city in
crisis, for people who have great educational and recreational needs."
To do this, Ivan is active in civic affairs and works closely with the
news media, schools, civic groups and professional organizations in the
city.
Before coming to JNEM in January Ivan was director of personnel for the
Service. Before that, he was personnel officer for the Southwest Region.
Under Ivan's direction, the park has helped sponsor music and dance
programs at the Arch, rotating art exhibits and, in December, Christmas
trees decorated in the styles of St. Louis's various ethnic groups.
In addition, JNEM has an active 1971, environmental education program.
The Gateway Arch doubles as an environmental study area, and last year
environmental education specialists Dick Youse and "Perry" Fuller
brought 68,000 inner-city children to the park.

Alice Peterson, a VIP at the Old Courthouse,
demonstrates hand work on an afghan to Park Technician Will Hlavac and
Assistant Superintendent Jack Wheat. (NPS photo)
"We emphasize the environmental as well as the historical aspects of the
park," Perry explains. "We start with the past, but explain that things
are going on now, too."
He says that they also take students to nearby state parks. Last year
they worked closely with the Missouri Botanical Gardens to develop the
arboretum as an environmental center.
Under Park Technician Will Hlavak's guidance, some rooms in the Old
Courthouse have been turned into typical nineteenth century frontier
cabins where quilting and weaving and other crafts are shown.
Just opened in the Old Courthouse is a nineteenth century trading post,
staffed by a costumed "trader," which contains not just furs, but also
goods that the settlers neededflour, silverware, soap, etc.
Charles Ross, chief of I&RM, oversees a large staff of VIP's
(volunteers in parks) who give the various demonstrations.
"Last year had over 100 people as volunteers," he said. "Some helped
with the living history program or assisted the librarian. Many
performers were VIP's too, including a full symphony orchestra, some
Hopi Indian dancers and a steel drum band."
He says that next year they will try for a strong "Summer in the Parks"
type program. Urban Intake Trainee Dick Danielson helped draft a
proposal for the program, which will be a cooperative venture between
NPS, state and local parks, schools and organizations.

"Beaver was the most important fur," says Park
Technician Frank Joachimsthaler, holding a specimen in the trading post
room of the Old Courthouse. "St. Louis was the fur trading center of the
world for many years, " he explains. "Fur trade is what opened up the
west." (NPS photo)
Because of these many activities, Superintendent Parker has been
presented with the mayor's award for contributions to civic progress. In
addition, he has been asked to be part of the planning team and the
steering committee for the new convention center in St. Louis.
When people come to JNEM (some 25,000 daily during the peak summer
season), most head for the Gateway Arch. And despite its prominence
above, most activities there are below ground.
A slowly sloping walkway leads some 20 feet down to the glass door
entrances of the visitor center. Inside is a huge reception hall with
fountains, exhibits and two theaters (one not yet opened.)
Two trains, one in each leg of the Arch, make a four-minute curving
climb to a glassed-in observation room at the top. Electrically powered,
the trains consist of eight linked capsules, each holding up to five
passengers.
Keeping both trains going is the number one problem during the heavy
visitor season, according to Roy Scown, chief of maintenance.
"Maintenance during the visitor season is a 16-hour a day operation,
seven days a week," he says. He has some 25 maintenance employees to
assist him.
Harry Breitenstein, Foreman III, says that preventative maintenance is
the key to keeping the trains running.
"It's the little things that give us problems," he says. "For instance,
we have forty different safety switches, all of them spread out and
difficult to reach. Any one of them could cause the train to stop."
Obviously Harry has them under control, for they've never had a major
breakdown on the trains.
"Harry can touch the rails and know when something is wrong," boasts
Superintendent Parker.

Park Ranger Doug Harding talks to a family during Fair
St. Louis. (NPS photo)
Future Plans
Future plans include completion of the south theater underground, the
outdoor lighting and the landscaping. A pedestrian bridge is to be built
over the busy thoroughfare that separates the Arch from the Old
Courthouse.
Also to be built beneath the Arch, in an underground area the size of a
football field, is the Museum of Westward Expansion. When completed it
will be the largest museum in the Park System.
According to Milton Thompson, park historian, the museum will present a
chronicle of the westward movement of Americans beyond the Mississippi
from 1803 to 1890. It will combine history, natural history, science,
technology, art and music to tell the story from the various points of
view of the people involved.
(A feature on the museum appeared in the July 1972 issue of
Architectural Record magazine.)
Now being proposed is development of the East St. Louis waterfront, on
the Illinois side of the Mississippi. The area is a maze of railroad
tracks and box cars, warehouses and barge loading facilities.
As Interior Secretary Rogers C.B. Morton concluded on his visit there
last September, "The Archwhich is just as magnificent as I thought
it would behas set a standard for the cultural development of the
riverfront...I think it would be a shame if we do a great job on one
side of the river and not on the other."
Text from NPS Newsletter, Vo. 8 No. 1, January 22, 1973.

The JNEM Arch's Unique Tram System: Still Running After 30 Years
Bob Moore
The highlight of a visit to Jefferson National Expansion Memorial (JNEM)
is a ride to the top of the 630' Gateway Arch for a panoramic view of
the surrounding area. This ride is in the form of a special
transportation system, a unique combination of train, elevator and
amusement park ride. From the very inception of the Arch in 1947,
architect Eero Saarinen envisioned a "sky ride" to take visitors to the
top of the Arch. Saarinen felt that one way to interpret the memorial
would be to allow visitors to see the downtown area of St. Louis, the
mighty Mississippi River, and the land stretching to the West. In a 1948
description of his plans, Saarinen imagined a family at the top of the
Arch, seeing "the great plains beyond the city... [and] the great droves
of people who landed here and passed under your very feet on their way
to open up the West." But Saarinen had no idea how to get people up the
inside of his curving structure. Technology and creativity would have to
be used to solve the problem.
As plans for the Arch were revised in 1957 and money became available
for its construction, the Saarinen firm began to search for an elevator
company to create a "sky ride." None of the major firms would touch the
project, however, fearful that in any system so unique a breakdown or
accident would generate lawsuits and unfavorable publicity. Then, in
early 1960, a man named Dick Bowser stopped to visit a friend at the
Montgomery Elevator Company offices in Moline, Illinois.
Bowser had worked at many jobs over the years, including an
apprenticeship to his father, who was an elevator man. Bowser left the
University of Maryland without obtaining a degree in 1942 and enlisted
in the Navy, serving on a destroyer in the Pacific. After the war,
Bowser invented, manufactured and installed parking garage elevators
which could travel horizontally and diagonally through a structure,
eliminating ramps and driveways. Bowser's friend at Montgomery Elevator
told him about Saarinen's "transporter" project for the Gateway Arch,
and had his secretary call Saarinen's office. "By the time he handed the
telephone to me, recalled Bowser, "there were two of Saarinen's partners
on the line. Their first question was, 'did an elevator have to travel
vertically?' I said I didn't think so. I could remember that my father
built and installed a dumbwaiter that transferred from one hatchway to
another about half way up its vertical travel ... Their next question
was, 'when can you meet with Eero Saarinen?'"
A month after their initial meeting, Saarinen called and requested a
presentation from Bowser, as an independent contractor, for a workable
Arch transportation system. The catch was what Bowser had to come up
with a concept within two weeks. Bowser recalled that "The first drawing
that I got had an outline of the Arch, and down at the bottom was a
square that said 'elevator'that's all there was." Bowser sketched,
computed and dreamed day and night for the next two weeks to complete
his plans, at home in his basement. Bowser recalled that his criteria
included a National Park Service estimated passenger volume of 3,500
people in an 8-hour day, or up to 11,000 people in a 14-hour day.
Although Saarinen forbade any distortion of the exterior of the Arch,
Bowser had a free hand on the inside.
Bowser first looked at elevators. But getting people to the top of a
63-story catenary curve would require more than an ordinary elevator.
The Arch is a triangle in cross section, and the different slopes of its
curve limited a standard elevator to only the first 300 feet. Above that
level, a smaller elevator which could travel at a steeper angle would be
required. Between the larger and smaller elevators would have to be
machine rooms, pits, and waiting spaces which would have consumed about
six stories of the interior of the Arch. Bowser rejected standard
elevators early in his two-week search for a solution.
Next he turned to escalators but, once again, many units would have been
needed, and the cost would have been very high. Additionally, in the
upper sections of the Arch the slope of an escalator would not have
followed the required curvature. Bowser next considered a Ferris wheel
principle. He recalled that "this involved utilizing small containers of
people, with their seats pivoted to swing at any angle. This approach
involved a continuous chain pulling seats which would go up one leg of
the Arch and come down the other; but the distance... would have been
almost half a mile, too long for any chains or cables to negotiate
successfully. The Ferris wheel system would also have had to move on the
center line of the Arch, and no provision could be made for passengers
to get off at the top observation area. Finally, a combination of the
elevator principle and the Ferris wheel principle was developed into a
train of capsules." Designing capsules small enough to fit in the
cramped upper levels of the Arch was the key to solving the problem of
space.
After two weeks, Dick Bowser traveled to the offices of Eero Saarinen
Associates in Michigan for a 45-minute presentation. Bowser expected a
preliminary meeting with the architect and his staff, but instead walked
into a room filled with St. Louis area congressmen, the mayor of St.
Louis, construction engineers, and Director of the National Park Service
George B. Hartzog, Jr. Bowser made a 40-minute pitch of his ideas for
the trams, then endured several hours of relentless questioning. He
refused to be intimidated by the group, even though he was an
independent contractor with a college degree. His straightforward and
simple style won over the group, who realized that his unique solution
to the problem was the only practical plan they had seen.

Tram repair, March 1978 (NPS photo)
Within a few weeks Bowser had a contract, for a fee of $40,000, for a
two-year job; as it turned out, the job lasted six years, until 1967,
and Bowser stayed on with the Park Service maintenance staff at the Arch
until 1972. Bowser's original scheme was altered very little from the
idea he conceived during a two-week period in 1960. The eight small
capsules, used in each of the two Arch trains, "are similar to the
barrels used in cement mixers," according to Bowser.
"Each train capsule has a 5' diameter barrel.... The back has a center
pivot shaft, and surrounding the open front there is a frame with
rollers. The barrel can rotate within the frame, which is supported by
wheels running in channel-shaped tracks.
"There are 5 seats in each capsule, so the weight of the passengers
helps keep it in an upright position. Each capsule rotates approximately
155 degrees during the trip to the top of the Arch. When the capsule
starts out in the load zone, the tracks are overhead, but as it goes up
the Arch they come to be beneath the capsule. All the way along, the
framework rotates around the capsule. A separate train runs in each leg
of the Arch because there is great deal of difference in the amount of
time that loading takes at the top, where it is cramped, and at the
bottom, where there is a great deal of room. Each train of eight
capsules is powered by a typical heavy-duty elevator machine with
cables, counterweights and all of the safety features of a modern
high-speed passenger elevator. Each of the Arch trains carries 40
passengers and is capable of making a round trip in 9
minutesincluding loading and unloading passengers in both
directions. When running near capacity each train typically carries 200
to 225 passengers per hour."
The trams have been operating for 30 years, traveling a total of
approximately 300,000 miles and carrying over 27 million passengers. The
final car design was by Planet Corporation of Lansing, Michigan, and
they were built by General Steel Industries Inc. St. Louis Car Division,
from Reynolds aluminum supplied by Joseph T. Ryerson & Son. The five
fiberglass seats in each capsule are the only components of the cars and
carrier frames not made of aluminum; they were designed by Eero
Saarinen.
The trams were considered to be a transportation system, and found
financing for construction and day-to-day operations from the Bi-State
Development Agency, a local corporation licensed to run mass
transportation in the St. Louis area. The unique partnership between
Bi-State and the NPS at the Arch has allowed the dreams of Eero Saarinen
and Dick Bowser to become a reality. A maintenance crew, dedicated to
the Arch tram system, comprise some of the most specialized people in
the NPS, with a history of innovative solutions to their credit. Their
mission is to keep the trams running, and the service record of the
system is a testament to their effectiveness. The Arch trams are a
premier example of the uses of technology in interpretation. The Arch
tram system created by Dick Bowser is as unique and special as the Arch
itself, and is one of the many amazing aspects of Jefferson National
Expansion Memorial.
Bob Moore is a historian at Jefferson National Expansion Memorial, St.
Louis, Missouri.
Text from CRM, Vol. 21 No. 2, 1998.

National Park Service Employee Chuck Kalert with the
Old Light Bulb From the Top of the Arch. (NPS photo)
|
National Park Friends
|
Please Note: NPSHistory.com is an independent effort; we are not an
official partner of the National Park Service (NPS), though a
huge debt of gratitude is extended to all NPS employees (current
and former) and other park supporters who have graciously contributed
their personal collections, thus enabling us to present these rather
scarce documents for free public use. Due diligence has been employed in
scanning these documents in an attempt to ensure the accuracy of the
materials presented, however, we make no representations or warranties
of any kind about these digital documents. While most of the content
contained herein is in the public domain, the Website also contains
copyrighted works (permission to host this content is on file); please
respect the reserved rights of these copyright-holders. Use of this
Website is done so at your own risk; we are not responsible for
any loss or damage arising from information or links contained within
this site. Enjoy!
|
|