American Charcoal Making*
In the Era of the Cold-blast Furnace
By Jackson Kemper, III, Formerly Research Assistant, French Creek
Recreational Demonstration Area, Birdsboro, Pennsylvania.
[HOPEWELL Village National Historic Site,
Pennsylvania, contains a 170-year-old cold-blast furnace which was one
of the last of its type to compete with anthracite-fueled hot-air
furnaces. When it, with others of its kind, gave way before the new
processes that were destined to contribute vitally to the development of
America's great iron industry, a final chapter was written into the
record of a companion techniquethe making of furnace charcoal.
Aware that an abandoned art eventually might become a completely lost
one, the National Park Service provided a demonstration revival of the
obsolescent method so that accurate textual and photographic data could
be obtained for permanent record. Supervised by octogenarian Lafayette
Houck, last of the Hopewell colliers, all steps of the coaling process
of an earlier day were reenacted while Mr. Kemper stayed night and day
at the site of operations and assembled the information which follows.
Ed.]
Lafayette Houck, Hopewell's last collier.
|
Two and a half centuries ago the Schuylkill Valley in
Pennsylvania, which extends from the present coal region to the city of
Philadelphia, was an untouched wilderness. The section was not only rich
in metal and water power but possessed also a great wealth of timberland
which later became the first source of charcoal fuel for the great iron
industry to come.
The first colonists to discover the rich valley were
a group of Swedish people who had settled on the Delaware River in 1638.
They went up the Schuylkill by canoe and found a livelihood in trading
with the Indians, fishing for shad, and cultivating the rough but
fertile lands. In 1681 William Penn received his charter and grant from
Charles II of England in consideration of a debt of £16,000 due to
his father. With Penn came the great influx of English, Welsh, Dutch,
and German settlers to what later was the Province and State of
Pennsylvania.
Early colonial writers often mentioned rumors that
there was iron ore in the Schuylkill Valley, and Penn himself encouraged
the belief. It was not until 1716, however, that steps were taken to
transform into pig iron the great natural resources of ore, water power,
and timber. It was in that year that Thomas Rutter, who had been in
business as a blacksmith near Germantown as early as 1682, moved up the
river and constructed in the vicinity of what now is Pottstown the first
bloomery forge of the province. The great ore beds, the thick woodlands
assuring tremendous reserves of charcoal, and the bold streams promising
water power soon induced many capable and hopeful men to follow Rutter's
lead in the attempt to make iron. Between 1716 and 1771 more than 50
forges and furnaces are known to have been constructed in the province;
and there probably were countless others.
By 1719 Rotter was convinced that his experiment at
the mouth of the Manatawny could be developed into a great industry.
Accordingly, with his friend Thomas Potts, and with the support of
others, he began to build Colebrookdale, the first charcoal furnace in
the province. It is interesting that the first charcoal furnace in
England to cast hollow ware by the use of sand molds also was called
Colebrookdale.
So much jealousy was excited in England by the
excellent quality of the ironware produced in the American colonies and
shipped to the mother country that in 1719 a bill was introduced in
Parliament to prevent the construction of rolling and slitting mills
here. The bill was rejected but the news that the colonies could produce
good metal spread quickly and aroused the enthusiasm of many
enterprising young men.
William Bird, whose exact antecedents are not known,
came to Pennsylvania a year or two before 1728 and soon was recognized
as a contemporary with Rutter, Potts, Samuel Savage, and Samuel McNutt
in the establishment of forges and furnaces. When Rutter's will was
admitted to probate in Philadelphia, November 27, 1728, Bird was a
witness. He then was a resident of Amity township, a part of
Philadelphia County, and at the age of 23 had attained a position of
influence in his community, serving as a commissioner in the laying out
of public roads. By 1733 he was working at Pine Forge as a woodchopper
earning 2 shillings 8 pence a cord, and a few years later he rented a
one-eighth share in the forge at £40 a year. At about that time he
began to acquire property for his own enterprises west of the Schuylkill
and in the vicinity of Hay Creek. He started construction of the
Hopewell forge in the fall of 1743 and was handling pig iron as early as
March of the next year.
Upon the death of William Bird in 1761, forges at
Birdsboro and Hopewell passed to his son, Mark Bird, who took over the
management of the family business at the age of 22. Upon discovering a
rich ore vein near the Hopewell forge, he built a furnace there in 1770,
"or a year or two before." With the outbreak of the Revolutionary War,
he answered the call of the new country and, as a lieutenant colonel in
a regiment of Berks County volunteers, took command of his battalion and
equipped it with his personal funds.
A typical collier's hut.
|
At the height of Mark Bird's prosperity the
ironmaster believed himself immune to disaster. "Neither fire nor flood
can harm me," an expression of his, was quoted for many years in the
community. He was held in high esteem, and welcomed everywhere with the
utmost cordiality. He was wont to create an impression when he arrived
from Philadelphia in his coach drawn by four handsome horses. Yet both
flood and fire visited him. His vast holdings, spread into several
counties of Pennsylvania and into New Jersey and Virginia, suffered from
neglect during the war, and his personal means dwindled considerably as
a result of his patriotic generosity. The end came in 1788 when he was
"sold out" by the sheriff to satisfy various bonds.
With the Hopewell furnace as the center of activity,
a little feudal village had gradually developed consisting of the "Big
House," where the owner or manager lived, and the many tenant houses for
the families of the furnace men, colliers, woodchoppers, molders,
miners, teamsters, blacksmiths, wheelwrights, and others. The company
store supplied every need of the village inhabitants from food to
clothing, while a one-room schoolhouse gave to the younger generation
the fundamentals in reading, writing, and arithmetic. A large farm and
garden also were operated and maintained by the owner of the furnace to
supply the community with much of the foodstuff and to provide hay
enough for each family to keep a cow in an adjoining "one-cow"
stable.
The lady of the Big House was looked upon as the
mistress of the community. When anyone became ill or needed help in any
way, she was the first person to be called in and consulted. Social
activities at the Big House were festive occasions, particularly at
Christmas and New Year's when the entire village took part.
Until 1837 charcoal was the only fuel which could be
used successfully in the cold-blast furnace. Many attempts were made
between 1815 and 1838 to use the recently discovered anthracite coal,
but the experiments generally were unsatisfactory because the heat
generated was insufficient to melt the ore. Then James B. Neilson of
Scotland obtained a patent for the use of hot air in the blast. On
February 7, 1837, George Crane was successful in smelting iron at his
works in Ynyscedivin, Wales, by using Neilson's hot air blast on
anthracite coal and producing 36 tons a week. In May of that year,
Solomen W. Roberts of Philadelphia visited Crane's works in Wales and
witnessed the satisfactory results obtained from the method. Upon his
return to the United States, he made recommendations which resulted in
organization of the Lehigh Crane Iron Company to manufacture pig iron
with anthracite coal of the Lehigh Valley. This is believed to have been
the first successful furnace of its kind in the country.
Collier's hut under construction.
|
The reason that ironmasters of the nineteenth century
wished to convert their cold-blast charcoal furnaces into hot-blast
anthracite furnaces was based primarily on economic grounds. The
maintenance of great wood tracts and the expense of labor for making the
wood into charcoal were tremendous items. The use of anthracite coal not
only obviated these factors but also brought the industry out of the
wilderness, so to speak, and into the cities where product and market
were in closer proximity.
It is due to this economic stage in the evolution of
the great iron industry of Pennsylvania that the old art of making
charcoal has been forgotten. Hopewell furnace remained a cold-blast
charcoal furnace to its final blast and was one of the last works of its
kind to attempt modern competition.
*From The Regional Review,
National Park Service, Region One, Richmond, Va., vol. V, no. 1, July
1940, pp. 3-14.
|